The injury of radial n in spiral groove

DISCUSS THE ORTHOTIC MANAGEMENT OF HIGH RADIAL NERVE PALSY ?

An INTRODUCTION

1 RADIAL N IS THE MOST INJURED NERVE OUT OF 3 NERVES OF UPPER EXTREMITY

2 IT IS MOST VULNERABLE TO DAMAGE AT MID HUMERAL LEVEL SINCE IT SUPERFICIALLY WRAPS AROUND THE SPIRAL GROOVE

3 THE MOST COMMON CAUSE OF DAMAGE BEING DIRECT INJURY

HIGH RADIAL N PALSY

1 REFERS TO THE INJURY OF RADIAL N IN SPIRAL GROOVE

2 IN THIS TRICEPS MUSCLE IS SPARED RESULTING IN NO LOSS OF ELBOW FUNCTION

3 THERE WILL BE LOSS OF INNERVATION TO BRACHIORADIALIS AND SUPINATOR MUSCLE , ALL WRIST EXTENSORS , ALL EXTRINSIC FINGER EXTENSORS AND ALL EXTRINSIC THUMB ABDUCTORS

4 IN THIS THERE WILL BE INABILITY TO EXTEND AND STABILISING THE WRIST RESULTING IN INABILITY TO USE LONG FLEXORS ADEQUATELY IN MAKING A FIST

5 PALM SENSITIVITY WILL BE INTACT WHICH IS IN CONTRAST WITH THE ULNAR AND MEDIAN N PALSY IN WHICH SENSATION IS ALSO IMPAIRED

6 PERIOD OF RECOVERY IS FROM 5 WEEKS TO 8 MONTHS

FEATURES OF IDEAL SPLINT

CREATION OF HARMONY BETWEEN FINGER EXTENSION WITH WRIST FLEXION AND WRIST EXTENSION WITH FINGER FLEXION

ORTHOTIC MANAGEMENT

1 PRIORITY BEING STABILISATION OF WRIST WITH PRESERVATION OF POWER GRIP

2 STATIC SPLINT NOT RECOMMENDED AS IT FORMS CONTRACTURE ON PROLONGED USE

3 THE MOST POPULAR OF SPLINT DESIGN BEING - THOMAS SUSPENSION SPLINT BECAUSE IT EXTENDS THE WRIST , FINGER AND THUMB

4 OTHER MOST POPULAR SPLINT BEING OPPENHEIMER SPLINT

5 RECOMMENDED SPLINT - GRANGER SPLINT - IT IS BIOMEDICALLY SIMILAR BUT INSTEAD OF STRINGS DESIGNED FOR TENDONS IT HAS STATIC LINING AND FINGER LOOPS DIRECTLY ATTACHED TO OUTTRIGGER

ADVANTAGES OF STATIC LINING -

1 DOES NOT ALLOWS THE WRIST TO DROP BELOW THE NEUTRAL

2 MAINTENANCE OF NORMAL ARCH OF HAND

3 ABSENCE OF SPLINTING MATERIAL ON PALMAR ASPECT , THUS ALLOWING FULL SENSORY INPUT FOR GRASPING

4 A COMPARATIVE LOW PROFILE AS IT IS LESS BULKY